Audit Quality in Indonesia’s Plantation Sector: The Nexus of ESG and Firm Characteristics

Authors

  • Alfian Misran Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Dinda Aulia Nazwa Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Fira Nafwa Shafitri Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Nur Athiyya Garneta Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v14.i1.6

Keywords:

Audit Quality, ESG Performance, Audit Fees, Big Four Auditors, Risk-based Auditing

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines the determinants of audit quality by integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and firm characteristics within a risk-based audit framework. It aims to assess whether ESG performance constitutes a meaningful risk signal in auditors decision-making relative to traditional financial and economic risk factors in a high-risk industry context.

Design/methodology/approach – The empirical analysis focuses on plantation companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2022–2024 period. Audit quality is proxied by audit fees and the likelihood of appointing Big Four auditors. ESG performance is measured using a composite ESG score constructed through content analysis of annual and sustainability reports. Panel data regression and logistic regression models are employed, incorporating robust standard errors as well as industry and year fixed effects to control for unobserved heterogeneity.

Findings – The results show that firm size is positively and significantly associated with both audit fees and the probability of engaging Big Four auditors, while leverage exhibits a negative and significant relationship with both audit quality proxies. In contrast, ESG performance, operational complexity, and profitability do not demonstrate statistically significant effects on audit quality.

Originality/value – This study introduces a hierarchical risk perspective by demonstrating that financially binding risk factors dominate audit outcomes, while ESG performance currently functions as a weak contextual signal in audit pricing and auditor selection decisions in a high ESG-exposure industry in an emerging market.

Research limitations/implications – The study is limited to a single industry focusing on firms operating in the plantation sector and covers a relatively short observation period from 2022 to 2024. Future research should examine additional industries, extend the observation window, and explore measures of ESG credibility, including third-party assurance.

Article Type: Research paper

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aobdia, D., & Petacchi, R. (2022). The effect of audit firm internal inspections on auditor effort and financial reporting quality. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3419484 Azizkhani, M., Hossain, S., & Nguyen, M. (2023). Effects of audit committee chair characteristics on

auditor choice, audit fee and audit quality. Accounting & Finance, 63(3), 3675–3707. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13058

Bin-Feng, C., Mirza, S. S., Ahsan, T., & Qureshi, M. A. (2024). How uncertainty can determine corporate ESG performance? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2290–2310. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2695

Buallay, A. (2019). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance: Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371

Cardoni, A., Kiseleva, E., & Terzani, S. (2019). Evaluating the intra-industry comparability of sustainability reports: The case of the oil and gas industry. Sustainability, 11(4), 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041093

Chen, Q., & Su, W. (2026). Economic consequences of environmental, social, and governance performance on audit quality in China. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 15(1), 347–

366. https://doi.org/10.31181/ijes1512026242

Choi, S., & Rhee, C. S. (2023). The effect of audit quality on the level of ESG: Accounting audit and sustainability management. Korean Accounting Information Association, 41(3), 111–140. https://doi.org/10.29189/KAIAAIR.41.3.5

Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5

Coelho, R., Jayantilal, S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2023). The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1535–1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2446

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

Doloksaribu, K. N., Azzahra, A. S., & Chrisna, H. (2025). The effect of audit quality, leverage, audit opinion and profitability on audit report lag in healthcare sector companies listed on the IDX in 2020-2023. International Journal of Integrative Sciences, 4(6), 1417–1434. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v4i6.389

Falisah, D. S., Setyadi, E. J., Santoso, S. B., & Kusbandiyah, A. (2025). Pengaruh fee audit, ukuran KAP, ukuran perusahaan, audit report lag terhadap kualitas audit (Studi pada perusahaan manufaktur sektor industrial yang terdaftar di BEI 2020-2024). JAFM: Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v6i3

García-Sánchez, I., Hussain, N., Khan, S., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2022). Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Examining the role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2186

Gidage, M., & Bhide, S. (2025). Exploring the ESG–audit fees nexus: Insights from Indian firms.

Managerial Auditing Journal, 40(7), 1136–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2024-4510 Gray, R. (2008). Social and environmental accounting and reporting: from ridicule to revolution? from

hope to hubris? - a personal review of the field. Issues In Social and Environmental Accounting, 2(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v2i1.22

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5. ed). McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Habib, S. M., Hussain, H., Al-Faryan, M. A. S., & Hussain, R. Y. (2022). Impact of firm characteristics and ownership structure on firm efficiency: evidence from non-financial firms of Pakistan.

Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2106628. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2106628 Hikmah, N., & Daljono, D. (2023). The impact of ESG disclosure, liquidity, and leverage on firm value

mediated by profitability performance. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(2), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i2.504

Hope, O.-K., & Langli, J. C. (2010). Auditor independence in a private firm and low litigation risk setting. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 573–605. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.573

Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 385–421. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350

Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., Tang, D. Y., & Zhong, R. (2024). The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure around the world. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1795–1847. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12548

Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12115

Li, X., & Liu, M. (2024). Abnormal audit fees and financial reporting quality: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 55, 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100622

Li, W., Li, T., & Zhu, H. (2025). Annual report audit, ESG report assurance and audit quality: Evidence

from the same accounting firm. China Journal of Accounting Research, 18(3), 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100434

Makhdalena, M., Zulvina, D., Zulvina, Y., Amelia, R. W., & Wicaksono, A. P. (2023). ESG and firm performance in developing countries: Evidence from ASEAN. Etikonomi, 22(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v22i1.25271

Murphy, K. J. (2013). Executive compensation: where we are, and how we got there. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance (2) 211–356. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-453594-8.00004-5

OJK. (2017). Regulation No. 51/POJK.03/2017 on Sustainable Finance Implementation.

Putri, R. V. A., & Witono, B. (2025). Pengaruh independensi auditor, audit tenure, fee audit, rotasi kap, dan ukuran kap terhadap kualitas audit. JESYA: Jurnal Ekonomi & Ekonomi Syariah, 8(1), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v8i1.1961

Rahman, M. H., Musyaffi, A. M., & Nindito, M. (2024). Pengaruh profitabilitas, risiko perusahaan, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap audit fee. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan Dan Auditing, 5(1), 954–965. https://doi.org/10.21009/japa.0501.06

Shaorou, H., Chenyu, L., & Ming, L. (2023). Signaling, auditing fees, and earnings surprise before and after split-share structure reform in China. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 15(2), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAT2023.0563

Shen, X., Wu, A., Ding, Y., Sun, Q., & Liu, M. (2024). Employee education, labor protection intensity and auditor risk perception. Plos One, 19(6), e0298938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298938

Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397

Sofiana, N. S., Hizazi, A., & Herawaty, N. (2023). Analysis of the effect of good corporate governance and audit quality of the cost of bank loans in the company LQ-45 index 2016-2021. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 7(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v7i1.21958

Tsang, A., Frost, T., & Cao, H. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review. The British Accounting Review, 55(1), 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101149

Velte, P. (2022). Does sustainable corporate governance have an impact on materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting? International evidence. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1655–1670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2333

Visedsun, N., Haekerd, K., Kwanmuang, P., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2025). Does audit quality enhance the value relevance of earnings and book value on the market price of common shares?

Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100547

Zahid, M., Martins, J. M., Rahman, H. U., Mata, M. N., Shah, S. A., & Mata, P. N. (2021). The interconnection between decent workplace and firm financial performance through the mediation of environmental sustainability: lLessons from an emerging economy. Sustainability, 13(8), 4570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084570

Zahroh, B. M., & Hersugondo. (2021). Pengaruh kinerja environmental, social, dan governance terhadap kinerja keuangan dengan kekuatan CEO sebagai variabel moderasi (Studi pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2015-2019). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 10(3), 1–15.

Zhang, X., Huang, Y., & Fenglan Wei. (2024). The incentive effects of the macro tax burden on economic growth: A negative or positive incentive effect? analysis based on panel data. International Review of Economics & Finance, 93, 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.006

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Misran, A. ., Nazwa, D. A. ., Shafitri, ⁠Fira N. ., & Garneta, N. A. (2026). Audit Quality in Indonesia’s Plantation Sector: The Nexus of ESG and Firm Characteristics. Wahana Riset Akuntansi, 14(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v14.i1.6